Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Defense Bank Canada results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 116 hits . Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,530 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Defense Bank Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Nato Defense Bank Canada
Keyword details
Total words: 1,268
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst