Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Allies results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 747 hits . Analysis detected 6,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,488 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,632 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Allies is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Nato Allies
Keyword details
Total words: 8,488
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst