Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These National Science Foundation results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,621 hits . Analysis detected 8,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,117 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,481 keywords). This National Science Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. National Science Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 10,117
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst