Keyword summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Cultural Fund results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,115 of 37,536 keywords). This National Cultural Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
National Cultural Fund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠76%National Cultural Fund (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.7%23.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos