Keyword summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Academies Of Sciences Engineering And Medicine results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 9,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,503 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (6,657 of 37,536 keywords). This National Academies Of Sciences Engineering And Medicine is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
National Academies Of Sciences Engineering And Medicine
Keyword details
Total words: 4,503
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 22.2%22.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos