Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Barzgatze results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (12,193 of 37,530 keywords). This Nate Barzgatze is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Nate Barzgatze
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠68%Nate Barzgatze (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos