Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natasha Johnson results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 3,030 hits . Analysis detected 17,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,470 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Natasha Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Natasha Johnson
Keyword details
Total words: 9,470
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.0% 32.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst