Keyword summary
17% 2 analyzed articles/videos 792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Price results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,983 of 37,536 keywords). This Natalie Price is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Natalie Price
Keyword details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst