Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nashville Police And Public Safety Alliance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Nashville Police And Public Safety Alliance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nashville Police And Public Safety Alliance
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,227
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos