Keyword summary
23% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naomi Osaka results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,949 hits . Analysis detected 13,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,334 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,899 of 37,536 keywords). This Naomi Osaka is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Naomi Osaka
Keyword details
Total words: 21,334
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 49% 7/24/2026, 9:48:54 AM