Keyword summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 1,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naismith Hall Of Fame results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 796 hits . Analysis detected 4,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,703 of 37,536 keywords). This Naismith Hall Of Fame is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Naismith Hall Of Fame
Keyword details
Total words: 4,953
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst