Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naim Kassem results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 2,254 hits. Analysis detected 10,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,164 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (30,006 of 37,536 keywords). This Naim Kassem is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Naim Kassem
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠21%Naim Kassem (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos