Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muslims results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 7,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,876 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,053 of 37,199 keywords). This Muslims is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Muslims
Keyword details
Total words: 6,876
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst