Keyword summary
59%2 analyzed articles/videos766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muslim Americans results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 3,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,677 of 37,536 keywords). This Muslim Americans is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Muslim Americans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Muslim Americans (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos