Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Museum Conservation results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 38% (23,494 of 37,536 keywords). This Museum Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Museum Conservation
Keyword details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst