Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mukesh Mangal results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,732 of 37,536 keywords). This Mukesh Mangal is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Mukesh Mangal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Mukesh Mangal (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos