Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Much Ado About Nothing results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Halo Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,670 hits . Analysis detected 9,791 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,737 of 37,536 keywords). This Much Ado About Nothing is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Much Ado About Nothing
Keyword details
Total words: 12,096
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst