Keyword summary
31% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mrna Vaccines results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 552 hits . Analysis detected 4,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,501 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,293 of 37,536 keywords). This Mrna Vaccines is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Mrna Vaccines
Keyword details
Total words: 5,501
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst