Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mosquito Speakers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 878 hits. Analysis detected 6,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,633 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,528 of 37,536 keywords). This Mosquito Speakers is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Mosquito Speakers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Mosquito Speakers (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,633
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.9% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 18.9%18.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos