Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Montreal Victoire results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,319 hits . Analysis detected 4,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,044 of 37,536 keywords). This Montreal Victoire is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Montreal Victoire
Keyword details
Total words: 6,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst