Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed Javad Zarif results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,070 of 37,536 keywords). This Mohammed Javad Zarif is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Mohammed Javad Zarif
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
52%Mohammed Javad Zarif (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos