Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohamed Salah results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 352 hits . Analysis detected 1,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,054 of 37,536 keywords). This Mohamed Salah is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Mohamed Salah
Keyword details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst