Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Modified Cars results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,410 of 36,190 keywords). This Modified Cars is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Modified Cars
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
33%Modified Cars (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos