Keyword summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos1,857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mockery results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,494 hits. Analysis detected 8,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (18,564 of 55,683 keywords). This Mockery is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Mockery
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠67%Mockery (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,048
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos