Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mob Rule results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Genetic Fallacy , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 546 hits . Analysis detected 3,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,537 of 37,536 keywords). This Mob Rule is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Mob Rule
Keyword details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.2% percentile 8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.9% 39.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 32.2% 32.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 32.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst