Keyword summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos1,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mo Healthnet results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 763 hits. Analysis detected 7,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,003 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (26,419 of 37,536 keywords). This Mo Healthnet is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Mo Healthnet
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠30%Mo Healthnet (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,003
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos