Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Lama results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 3,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,791 of 37,189 keywords). This Mitchell Lama is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Mitchell Lama
Keyword details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst