Keyword summary
40%2 analyzed articles/videos1,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mistral results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 6,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,447 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,178 of 37,536 keywords). This Mistral is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Mistral
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Mistral (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,447
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos