Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri School Funding results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Pessimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 2,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,430 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,391 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri School Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Missouri School Funding
Keyword details
Total words: 1,430
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst