Keyword summary
22% 13 analyzed articles/videos 10,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Constitution results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 4,752 hits . Analysis detected 30,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,486 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,500 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri Constitution is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Missouri Constitution
Keyword details
Total words: 50,486
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles50.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst