Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Abortion Amendment results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,774 hits . Analysis detected 11,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,918 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (33,766 of 35,211 keywords). This Missouri Abortion Amendment is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Missouri Abortion Amendment
Keyword details
Total words: 19,918
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst