Keyword summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos2,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mississippi Delta results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hindsight Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 7,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,322 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,271 of 37,536 keywords). This Mississippi Delta is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Mississippi Delta
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
4%Mississippi Delta (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,322
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751003.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate