Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Vikings results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 1,127 hits . Analysis detected 10,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,293 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,737 of 37,481 keywords). This Minnesota Vikings is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Minnesota Vikings
Keyword details
Total words: 6,293
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst