Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Ice Shootings results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 4,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,189 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,508 of 37,536 keywords). This Minnesota Ice Shootings is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Minnesota Ice Shootings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Minnesota Ice Shootings (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,189
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos