Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Golden Gophers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 4,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,453 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,173 of 37,536 keywords). This Minnesota Golden Gophers is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Minnesota Golden Gophers
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,453
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos