Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Frost results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,393 hits . Analysis detected 5,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,677 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,245 of 37,536 keywords). This Minnesota Frost is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Minnesota Frost
Keyword details
Total words: 6,677
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst