Keyword summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis City Council results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,068 hits . Analysis detected 6,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,989 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,579 of 37,536 keywords). This Minneapolis City Council is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Minneapolis City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 4,989
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst