Keyword summary
â 89% 1 analyzed article/video 668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ministry Of Defence results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 171 hits . Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of â 54% (17,378 of 37,536 keywords). This Ministry Of Defence is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. Ministry Of Defence
Keyword details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst