Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Military Personnel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 2,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,675 keywords). This Military Personnel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Military Personnel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Military Personnel (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.7%14.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos