Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Chaplains results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,072 hits . Analysis detected 9,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,446 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,232 of 37,536 keywords). This Military Chaplains is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Military Chaplains
Keyword details
Total words: 5,446
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst