Keyword summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Casualties results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 739 hits . Analysis detected 6,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,793 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,705 of 35,675 keywords). This Military Casualties is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Military Casualties
Keyword details
Total words: 5,793
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst