Keyword summary
42% 3 analyzed articles/videos 871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lindell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 6,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,597 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,346 of 37,533 keywords). This Mike Lindell is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Mike Lindell
Keyword details
Total words: 5,597
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst