Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike-Gansey results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 3,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,739 of 37,533 keywords). This Mike-Gansey is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Mike-Gansey
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Mike-Gansey (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos