Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Wars Energy Asia Gas Oil results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 1,413 hits. Analysis detected 8,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (5,009 of 37,536 keywords). This Middle East Wars Energy Asia Gas Oil is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Middle East Wars Energy Asia Gas Oil
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠87%Middle East Wars Energy Asia Gas Oil (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 27.2%27.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.9%13.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 27.2%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos