Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Peace Talks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 4,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,652 of 37,536 keywords). This Middle East Peace Talks is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Middle East Peace Talks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Middle East Peace Talks (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos