Keyword summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Senate Primary results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 947 hits . Analysis detected 8,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,994 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,289 of 37,536 keywords). This Michigan Senate Primary is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Michigan Senate Primary
Keyword details
Total words: 5,994
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst