Keyword summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Governor Candidates results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 665 hits . Analysis detected 3,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (50,999 of 51,244 keywords). This Michigan Governor Candidates is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Michigan Governor Candidates
Keyword details
Total words: 15,260
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst