Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Tilson Thomas results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 2,568 hits . Analysis detected 6,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,775 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael Tilson Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michael Tilson Thomas
Keyword details
Total words: 5,775
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 44.5% 44.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 44.5%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst