Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Moore results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 1,849 hits. Analysis detected 11,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,507 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Michael Moore
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Michael Moore (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510085.3% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.5%37.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 39.9%39.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 32.0%32.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 32.0%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos