Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael D Tanner results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 951 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Michael D Tanner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Michael D Tanner
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Michael D Tanner (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 951
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles951 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.8%28.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 38.1%38.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos